Jackson v. Pletcher et al
Filing
242
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/02/14 ordering that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendant Osman's summary judgment motion; defendant may file a reply within 14 days thereafter; if deemed necessary, after reviewing the record, the court will set a hearing for oral argument. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RAYMOND D. JACKSON,
12
13
14
No. 2: 11-cv-1157 JAM KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
STEVEN PLETCHER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Pending before the court is defendant Osman’s summary judgment motion filed December
18
12, 2013. On June 30, 2014, the Honorable John A. Mendez denied plaintiff’s motion to stay this
19
action pending the Ninth Circuit’s ruling on plaintiff’s appeal of the order granting defendants’
20
motion to dismiss. Now that all pending matters have been resolved, the court sets a briefing
21
schedule for defendant Osman’s summary judgment motion.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days of the date of this
23
order, plaintiff shall file an opposition to defendant Osman’s summary judgment motion;
24
defendant may file a reply within fourteen days thereafter; if deemed necessary, after reviewing the
25
record, the court will set a hearing for oral argument.
26
Dated: July 2, 2014
27
28
Jack1157.ord
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?