Jackson v. Pletcher et al
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/7/12 ORDERING that within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiffs request to modify the scheduling order. (Dillon, M)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND D. JACKSON,
No. 2: 11-cv-1157 JAM KJN P
STEVEN FLETCHER, et al.,
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, represented by counsel, proceeding with a civil rights
action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 21, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to modify
the scheduling order. Plaintiff requests that the discovery cut-off date be extended from March 9,
2012 to May 9, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the
date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiff’s request to
modify the scheduling order.1
DATED: March 7, 2012
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Local Rule 230 provides that motions are to be noticed for hearing. In the future,
plaintiff’s counsel shall abide by this rule. If defendants request a hearing regarding the pending
motion, they shall inform the court in their briefing.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?