Jackson v. Pletcher et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/7/12 ORDERING that within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiffs request to modify the scheduling order. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

RAYMOND D. JACKSON,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,

No. 2: 11-cv-1157 JAM KJN P

vs.
STEVEN FLETCHER, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14

ORDER
/

15

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, represented by counsel, proceeding with a civil rights

16

action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 21, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to modify

17

the scheduling order. Plaintiff requests that the discovery cut-off date be extended from March 9,

18

2012 to May 9, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the

19

date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiff’s request to

20

modify the scheduling order.1

21

DATED: March 7, 2012
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

22
23

jack1157.ord

24
25
26

1

Local Rule 230 provides that motions are to be noticed for hearing. In the future,
plaintiff’s counsel shall abide by this rule. If defendants request a hearing regarding the pending
motion, they shall inform the court in their briefing.
1