Jackson v. Pletcher et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/7/12 ORDERING that within seven days of the date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiffs request to modify the scheduling order. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, 10 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2: 11-cv-1157 JAM KJN P vs. STEVEN FLETCHER, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 ORDER / 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, represented by counsel, proceeding with a civil rights 16 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 21, 2012, plaintiff filed a motion to modify 17 the scheduling order. Plaintiff requests that the discovery cut-off date be extended from March 9, 18 2012 to May 9, 2012. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within seven days of the 19 date of this order, defendants shall inform the court whether they oppose plaintiff’s request to 20 modify the scheduling order.1 21 DATED: March 7, 2012 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 jack1157.ord 24 25 26 1 Local Rule 230 provides that motions are to be noticed for hearing. In the future, plaintiff’s counsel shall abide by this rule. If defendants request a hearing regarding the pending motion, they shall inform the court in their briefing. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?