Jackson v. Pletcher et al

Filing 97

STIPULATION and ORDER for the dismissal with prejudice of defendants Warhover and Dunlap signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/16/12. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
3 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290 Sacramento, CA 95822 (916) 456-1122 (916) 737-1126 (fax) 4 Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021 5 Attorneys for defendants CATE, OSMAN, JOLLEY, MEHTA, SABIN, WARHOVER and DUNLAP 1 2 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR., Plaintiff, 11 12 vs. 13 STEVE PLETCHER, et al., Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: 2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS WARHOVER AND DUNLAP 15 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Warhover and Dunlap Page 1 1 The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby 2 stipulate to the dismissal of defendants WARHOVER and DUNLAP from this action 3 with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees. 4 Dated: April 11, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARTIN 5 By: /s/Paul Martin PAUL MARTIN, CSB 154076 Attorneys for plaintiff RAYMOND JACKSON, SR. 6 7 8 9 Dated: April 16, 2012 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 10 By:_/s/ Kathleen J. Williams KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021 Attorneys for defendants CATE, OSMAN, JOLLEY, MEHTA, SABIN, WARHOVER and DUNLAP 11 12 13 14 Dated: April 11, 2012 HASSARD BONNINGTON, LLP 15 By:_/s/ Marcell P. Neri MARCELL P. NERI, CSB 258537 WESLEY PRATT, CSB 191159 Attorneys for defendant PLETCHER 16 17 18 IT IS SO ORDERED 19 Dated: 4/16/2012 20 /s/ John A. Mendez John A. Mendez, Judge United States District Court Eastern District of California 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Warhover and Dunlap Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?