Jackson v. Pletcher et al
Filing
97
STIPULATION and ORDER for the dismissal with prejudice of defendants Warhover and Dunlap signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 4/16/12. (Matson, R)
3
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
(916) 456-1122
(916) 737-1126 (fax)
4
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
5
Attorneys for defendants
CATE, OSMAN, JOLLEY,
MEHTA, SABIN, WARHOVER and DUNLAP
1
2
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, SR.,
Plaintiff,
11
12
vs.
13
STEVE PLETCHER, et al.,
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO: 2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF
DEFENDANTS WARHOVER AND
DUNLAP
15
16
///
17
///
18
///
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Warhover and Dunlap
Page 1
1
The parties to this action, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby
2
stipulate to the dismissal of defendants WARHOVER and DUNLAP from this action
3
with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and attorneys fees.
4
Dated: April 11, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF PAUL R. MARTIN
5
By: /s/Paul Martin
PAUL MARTIN, CSB 154076
Attorneys for plaintiff
RAYMOND JACKSON, SR.
6
7
8
9
Dated: April 16, 2012
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES
10
By:_/s/ Kathleen J. Williams
KATHLEEN J. WILLIAMS, CSB 127021
Attorneys for defendants CATE,
OSMAN, JOLLEY, MEHTA, SABIN,
WARHOVER and DUNLAP
11
12
13
14
Dated: April 11, 2012
HASSARD BONNINGTON, LLP
15
By:_/s/ Marcell P. Neri
MARCELL P. NERI, CSB 258537
WESLEY PRATT, CSB 191159
Attorneys for defendant PLETCHER
16
17
18
IT IS SO ORDERED
19
Dated: 4/16/2012
20
/s/ John A. Mendez
John A. Mendez, Judge
United States District Court
Eastern District of California
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Jackson v. Pletcher [2:11-CV-01157-JAM-KJN-P]Stipulation and Order for Dismissal of Warhover and Dunlap
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?