Lawson v. Citicorp Trust Bank et al
Filing
29
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/22/11: 13 Findings and recommendations filed on June 27,2011 are moot and the court need not reach their merits. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the findings and recommendations on these grounds. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TRACY D. LAWSON,
11
Plaintiff,
vs.
12
13
No. CIV-S-11-1163-KJM-KJN-PS
CITICORP TRUST BANK, et al.,
14
15
Defendants.
__________________________________/
ORDER
On June 27, 2011, the magistrate judge assigned to this case filed findings and
16
17
recommendations regarding plaintiff’s second application for a temporary restraining order.
18
(ECF 13.) The magistrate judge recommended that the application be denied on procedural
19
grounds, but permitted plaintiff to file a third application for emergency relief prior to the
20
resolution of the findings and recommendations entered on June 27, 2011. Plaintiff did not file
21
objections to the June 27, 2011 findings and recommendations, but filed a third application for
22
emergency relief on July 8, 2011, which sought the same relief as the second such application.
23
The undersigned denied plaintiff’s third application on the merits. (Order, July 11, 2011, ECF
24
22.)
25
////
26
////
1
1
In light of the denial of plaintiff’s third application for emergency relief on the
2
merits, the proposed findings and recommendations filed on June 27,2011 are moot and the court
3
need not reach their merits. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the
4
findings and recommendations on these grounds.
5
DATED: August 22, 2011.
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
laws1163.jo.tro
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?