Pinola v. Virga, et al

Filing 27

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/7/2011 ORDERING that within 14 days, the Warden of CCI shall inform the court of the status of plaintiff's access to his legal property; the clerk is to serve this order on the Warden of CCI and the Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson)(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RATAJA PINOLA, 11 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, No. 2: 11-cv-1165 KJM KJN P vs. TIM V. VIRGA, et al., Defendants. ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the California Correctional 18 Institution (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California. 19 On December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for production of documents. 20 Plaintiff states that he was transferred to CCI on September 8, 2011. Plaintiff alleges that 21 following his transfer, prison officials at CCI lost his legal property related to this action. 22 Plaintiff alleges that without access to his legal property, he cannot file an opposition to 23 defendants’ motion to dismiss filed September 28, 2011. 24 No defendants in this matter are located at CCI. Usually persons or entities not 25 parties to an action are not subject to orders for injunctive relief. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine 26 Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969). However, the fact that one is not a party does not 1 1 automatically preclude the court from acting. The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) permits the 2 court to issue writs “necessary or appropriate in aid of their jurisdictions and agreeable to the 3 usages and principles of law.” See generally S.E.C. v. G.C. George Securities, Inc., 637 F.2d 685 4 (9th Cir. 1981); United States v. New York Telephone Co., 434 U.S. 159 (1977). This section 5 does not grant the court plenary power to act in any way it wishes; rather, the All Writs Act is 6 meant to aid the court in the exercise and preservation of its jurisdiction. Plum Creek Lumber 7 Company v. Hutton, 608 F.2d 1283, 1289 (9th Cir. 1979). 8 The court is concerned that it will lose jurisdiction if plaintiff is unable to file an 9 opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss because he does not have access to his legal 10 property. Accordingly, the Warden of CCI is ordered to inform the court of the status of 11 plaintiff’s access to his legal property. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, the Warden of CCI shall inform 14 the court of the status of plaintiff’s access to his legal property; 15 16 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Warden of CCI, P.O. Box 1031, Tehachapi, CA, 93581; and 17 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Supervising Deputy 18 Attorney General Monica Anderson. 19 DATED: December 7, 2011 20 21 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 pin1165.alw 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?