Pinola v. Virga, et al
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/7/2011 ORDERING that within 14 days, the Warden of CCI shall inform the court of the status of plaintiff's access to his legal property; the clerk is to serve this order on the Warden of CCI and the Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Monica Anderson. (cc: Monica Anderson)(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
RATAJA PINOLA,
11
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
No. 2: 11-cv-1165 KJM KJN P
vs.
TIM V. VIRGA, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with a civil rights action
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff is presently incarcerated at the California Correctional
18
Institution (“CCI”) in Tehachapi, California.
19
On December 5, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion for production of documents.
20
Plaintiff states that he was transferred to CCI on September 8, 2011. Plaintiff alleges that
21
following his transfer, prison officials at CCI lost his legal property related to this action.
22
Plaintiff alleges that without access to his legal property, he cannot file an opposition to
23
defendants’ motion to dismiss filed September 28, 2011.
24
No defendants in this matter are located at CCI. Usually persons or entities not
25
parties to an action are not subject to orders for injunctive relief. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine
26
Research, Inc., 395 U.S. 100 (1969). However, the fact that one is not a party does not
1
1
automatically preclude the court from acting. The All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) permits the
2
court to issue writs “necessary or appropriate in aid of their jurisdictions and agreeable to the
3
usages and principles of law.” See generally S.E.C. v. G.C. George Securities, Inc., 637 F.2d 685
4
(9th Cir. 1981); United States v. New York Telephone Co., 434 U.S. 159 (1977). This section
5
does not grant the court plenary power to act in any way it wishes; rather, the All Writs Act is
6
meant to aid the court in the exercise and preservation of its jurisdiction. Plum Creek Lumber
7
Company v. Hutton, 608 F.2d 1283, 1289 (9th Cir. 1979).
8
The court is concerned that it will lose jurisdiction if plaintiff is unable to file an
9
opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss because he does not have access to his legal
10
property. Accordingly, the Warden of CCI is ordered to inform the court of the status of
11
plaintiff’s access to his legal property.
12
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. Within fourteen days of the date of this order, the Warden of CCI shall inform
14
the court of the status of plaintiff’s access to his legal property;
15
16
2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Warden of CCI, P.O.
Box 1031, Tehachapi, CA, 93581; and
17
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on Supervising Deputy
18
Attorney General Monica Anderson.
19
DATED: December 7, 2011
20
21
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
22
23
pin1165.alw
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?