Morris v. Bradford et al

Filing 32

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/2014 ADOPTING IN FULL 31 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 25 Motion to Revoke Plaintiff's IFP Status/Motion to Dismiss. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LEON E. MORRIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-1171 LKK DAD P

v.

ORDER

BRADFORD et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On November 26, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

24
25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 26, 2013, are adopted in full;

2

2. Defendants’ motions to revoke plaintiff’s IFP status pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

3

and to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 11 and 18 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

4

(Doc. No. 25) are denied.

5

DATED: January 9, 2014.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2