Morris v. Bradford et al

Filing 74

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/21/16 ordering that withi 14 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the defendants. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON E. MORRIS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-1171 TLN CKD P (TEMP) v. ORDER BRADFORD et al., 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action brought pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2016, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment 19 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for 20 a sixty-day extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ motion, which this court 21 granted. The time for filing his opposition has now expired, but plaintiff has not filed an 22 opposition or otherwise responded to defendants’ motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 23 24 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 25 the granting of the motion . . . .” On December 20, 2012, plaintiff was advised of the 26 requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may 27 be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 28 ///// 1 1 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for 2 imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of 3 the Court.” In the order filed December 20, 2012, plaintiff was advised that failure to comply 4 with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed. 5 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days of the 6 date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion for summary judgment 7 filed on behalf of the defendants. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of 8 non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant 9 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Alternatively, if plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this 10 action he may file a request to voluntarily dismiss this case. 11 Dated: April 21, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12 13 14 15 ec morr1171.46msj 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?