Morris v. Bradford et al

Filing 75

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/10/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEON E. MORRIS, 12 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-1171 TLN CKD P (TEMP) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BRADFORD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action brought pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2016, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On 19 February 5, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for a sixty-day (60) extension of time to oppose 20 defendants’ motion, which this court granted. That sixty-day period expired, and plaintiff did not 21 oppose or otherwise respond to the motion. On April 21, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to 22 show cause in writing within fourteen days why this court should not grant the pending motion 23 for summary judgment. The court cautioned plaintiff that his failure to file an opposition would 24 result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. That fourteen-day period has now 25 expired, and plaintiff has not opposed defendants’ motion for summary judgment or responded to 26 the court’s order. 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 1 1 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 2 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 3 after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 4 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 5 “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the 6 objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The 7 parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to 8 appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 9 Dated: May 10, 2016 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 ec morr1171.ftp 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?