Morris v. Bradford et al
Filing
75
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 05/10/16 recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(b). Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON E. MORRIS,
12
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-1171 TLN CKD P (TEMP)
Plaintiff,
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
BRADFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action brought pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 14, 2016, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On
19
February 5, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for a sixty-day (60) extension of time to oppose
20
defendants’ motion, which this court granted. That sixty-day period expired, and plaintiff did not
21
oppose or otherwise respond to the motion. On April 21, 2016, the court ordered plaintiff to
22
show cause in writing within fourteen days why this court should not grant the pending motion
23
for summary judgment. The court cautioned plaintiff that his failure to file an opposition would
24
result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. That fourteen-day period has now
25
expired, and plaintiff has not opposed defendants’ motion for summary judgment or responded to
26
the court’s order.
27
28
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
1
1
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
2
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
3
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
4
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
5
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
6
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
7
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
8
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
9
Dated: May 10, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
ec
morr1171.ftp
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?