Morris v. Bradford et al
Filing
89
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/22/18 ORDERING within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he has possession of his legal materials. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON E. MORRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-1171 TLN DB P
v.
ORDER
A.J.R. BRADFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action under
17
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. In January 2016, defendants moved for summary judgment. After he received
19
multiple extensions of time to file an opposition, plaintiff informed the court that he had been
20
temporarily transferred to a psychiatric program at Salinas Valley State Prison and did not have
21
access to his legal materials, which, he believed remained at California State Prison (“CSP”)-
22
Sacramento. In February 2017, the court stayed these proceedings until plaintiff regained access
23
to his legal paperwork. (ECF Nos. 86, 87.) Plaintiff was ordered to inform the court when he
24
was returned to CSP-Sacramento.
In August 2017, based on a notice filed by plaintiff in another case pending in this court,
25
26
plaintiff’s address was changed from Salinas Valley State Prison to California State Prison-
27
Lancaster. On January 17, 2018, defendants moved to reopen this case. (ECF No. 88.)
28
////
1
1
Defendants state that plaintiff remains at CSP-Lancaster and should now have possession of his
2
legal materials. Therefore, according to defendants, these proceedings should resume.
3
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty days of the date of
4
this order, plaintiff shall inform the court whether he has possession of his legal materials.
5
Dated: January 22, 2018
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DLB:9
DB/prisoner-civil rights/morr1171.mot lift stay
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?