Morris v. Bradford et al
Filing
99
ORDER ADOPTING 98 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 08/23/18; the stay is LIFTED; within 30 days, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants' 70 Motion for Summary Judgment; defendants shall file any reply per Local Rule 230(1). (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LEON E. MORRIS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-1171-TLN-DB P
v.
ORDER
A.J. R. BRADFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On May 18, 2018, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2018 (ECF No. 98) are ADOPTED
27
28
in full;
1
1
2. The stay of these proceedings is lifted; and
2
3. Within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall file his opposition to
3
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed January 14, 2016 (ECF No. 70). Defendants
4
shall file any reply in accordance with Local Rule 230(l).
5
6
Dated: August 23, 2018
7
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?