Corbett v. Hawkins et al
Filing
27
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/09/12 ordering defendant Sahir Naseer hereby substitutes Van Longyear of the Law Firm of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra LLP, 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230, Sacramento, CA 95864 in place and stead of Benjamin Dore, Deputy Attorney General and Attorney General's Office. (Plummer, M)
1
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
2
VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, California 95864-5923
Tel: 916-974-8500 Fax: 916 974-8510
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant Dr. Sahir Naseer, MD
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF
9
CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
10
11
MICHAEL CORBETT,
12
Plaintiff,
13
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND
ORDER
v.
14
Case No. 2:11-CV-1197 JFM (PC)
R. MICHAEL HAWKINS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
DEFENDANT, SAHIR NASEER, MD, hereby substitutes Van Longyear of the Law
19
Firm of Longyear, O’Dea & Lavra, LLP, 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230, Sacramento,
20
California 95864, (916) 974-8500, in the place and stead of Benjamin Dore, Deputy Attorney
21
General and Attorney General’s Office.
22
I agree to the above substitution
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: June 18, 2012
By: /s/ Sahir Naseer, MD
SAHIR NASEER, MD
.
1
2
I agree to the above substitution.
Dated: June 18, 2012
DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
3
4
By: /s/ Benjamin Dore
BENJAMIN DORE
Deputy Attorney General
5
6
7
8
I accept the above substitution.
9
10
Dated: June 18, 2012
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
11
By: s/ Van Longyear
VAN LONGYEAR
Attorney for Defendant
Sahir Naseer, MD
12
13
.
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Date: 7/9/2012
18
19
______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
DEAC_Signature-END:
21
/014;corb1197.subst
22
9cekb3i
23
24
25
26
27
28
Substitution of Attorney and Proposed Order
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?