Corbett v. Hawkins et al

Filing 27

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 07/09/12 ordering defendant Sahir Naseer hereby substitutes Van Longyear of the Law Firm of Longyear, O'Dea & Lavra LLP, 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230, Sacramento, CA 95864 in place and stead of Benjamin Dore, Deputy Attorney General and Attorney General's Office. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 2 VAN LONGYEAR, CSB NO. 84189 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230 Sacramento, California 95864-5923 Tel: 916-974-8500 Fax: 916 974-8510 3 4 Attorneys for Defendant Dr. Sahir Naseer, MD 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF 9 CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 MICHAEL CORBETT, 12 Plaintiff, 13 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY AND ORDER v. 14 Case No. 2:11-CV-1197 JFM (PC) R. MICHAEL HAWKINS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 DEFENDANT, SAHIR NASEER, MD, hereby substitutes Van Longyear of the Law 19 Firm of Longyear, O’Dea & Lavra, LLP, 3620 American River Drive, Suite 230, Sacramento, 20 California 95864, (916) 974-8500, in the place and stead of Benjamin Dore, Deputy Attorney 21 General and Attorney General’s Office. 22 I agree to the above substitution 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: June 18, 2012 By: /s/ Sahir Naseer, MD SAHIR NASEER, MD . 1 2 I agree to the above substitution. Dated: June 18, 2012 DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 3 4 By: /s/ Benjamin Dore BENJAMIN DORE Deputy Attorney General 5 6 7 8 I accept the above substitution. 9 10 Dated: June 18, 2012 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 11 By: s/ Van Longyear VAN LONGYEAR Attorney for Defendant Sahir Naseer, MD 12 13 . 14 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Date: 7/9/2012 18 19 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 DEAC_Signature-END: 21 /014;corb1197.subst 22 9cekb3i 23 24 25 26 27 28 Substitution of Attorney and Proposed Order Page 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?