Cox v. North et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/22/11 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST COX, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P T. NORTH, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. This action is before the 17 undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. Doc. 4. By order filed June 6, 2011, the court 18 granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the June 6, 2011 order, the 19 court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has 20 now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the 21 court’s order. 22 For the reasons given in the June 6, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 23 this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 DATED: August 22, 2011 25 26 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GGH: AB; cox1217.fta 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?