Cox v. North et al

Filing 8

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 08/22/11 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ERNEST COX,

11

Plaintiff,

12

vs.

13

No. CIV S-11-1217 GGH P

T. NORTH, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. This action is before the

17

undersigned pursuant to plaintiff’s consent. Doc. 4. By order filed June 6, 2011, the court

18

granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. In the June 6, 2011 order, the

19

court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has

20

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

21

court’s order.

22

For the reasons given in the June 6, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

23

this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

24

DATED: August 22, 2011

25
26

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH: AB; cox1217.fta

1