Salinas et al v. Wachovia Mortgage et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/5/11 GRANTING defendant Wachovia's request to appear telephonically at the 7/20/11 hearing.(Matson, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Christopher A. Carr (#44444)
ccarr@afrct.com
Viddell Lee Heard (#175049)
vheard@afrct.com
ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN,
CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP
199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600
Pasadena, California 91101-2459
Tel: (626) 535-1900
Fax: (626) 577-7764
Attorneys for Defendant
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division
of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank
Southwest, N.A., f/k/a WACHOVIA MORTGAGE,
FSB, f/k/a WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
MAMERTO Q. AND MINDA C.
SALINAS,
[The Hon. John A. Mendez, District Judge]
14
15
16
17
18
Plaintiffs,
vs.
WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORPORATION; and DOES 1-50,
inclusive,
19
20
21
22
23
24
Case No. 2:11-cv-01220-JAM-DAD
ORDER RE: APPLICATION OF
DEFENDANT TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AT THE JULY 20,
2011 HEARING
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
July 20, 2011
9:30 a.m.
6
Defendants.
The Court, having read and considered the request of counsel for defendant Wachovia
Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank
Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a defendant World Savings Bank, FSB
(“Wells Fargo”) to appear telephonically at the hearing scheduled for July 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m.
in Courtroom 6 of the above-entitled Court, hereby grants permission to appear telephonically.
25
26
Dated: 7/5/2011
/s/ John A. Mendez________________
HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
C:\Documents and
Settings\HVine\Desktop\11cv1220.o.7511.doc
1
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
2:11-CV-01220-JAM-DAD
ORDER RE WELLS FARGO’S APPLICATION TO
APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT HEARING
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this
action. I am employed in the city of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin,
Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600,
Pasadena, California 91101-2459.
5
On the date below I served a copy of the following documents:
6
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APPLICATION OF DEFENDANT TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AT THE JULY 20, 2011 HEARING
7
8
on all interested parties in said case as follows:
9
Served Electronically via Court’s CM/ECF System:
10
Counsel for Plaintiffs:
11
Kenneth R. Graham, Esq.
Law Offices of Kenneth R. Graham
1575 Treat Blvd., Suite 105
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
Tel: (925) 932-0170
12
13
14
Counsel for Defendant
15
CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION
16
Michele Mierzwa
michelle.mierzwa@prommis.com
Victoria E. Adams
Victoria.adams@prommis.com
525 E. Main St.
El Cajon, CA 92020
Telephone: (619) 590-9200
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BY MAIL: By placing the envelope for collection and mailing following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and
mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service
in Pasadena, California, in sealed envelopes with postage fully thereon.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the
Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in
Pasadena, California, on June 30, 2011.
Christine Daniel
(Type or Print Name)
/s/ Christine Daniel
(Signature of Declarant)
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?