Salinas et al v. Wachovia Mortgage et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/5/11 GRANTING defendant Wachovia's request to appear telephonically at the 7/20/11 hearing.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Christopher A. Carr (#44444) ccarr@afrct.com Viddell Lee Heard (#175049) vheard@afrct.com ANGLIN, FLEWELLING, RASMUSSEN, CAMPBELL & TRYTTEN LLP 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600 Pasadena, California 91101-2459 Tel: (626) 535-1900 Fax: (626) 577-7764 Attorneys for Defendant WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, f/k/a WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 MAMERTO Q. AND MINDA C. SALINAS, [The Hon. John A. Mendez, District Judge] 14 15 16 17 18 Plaintiffs, vs. WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; CALWESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 19 20 21 22 23 24 Case No. 2:11-cv-01220-JAM-DAD ORDER RE: APPLICATION OF DEFENDANT TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE JULY 20, 2011 HEARING Date: Time: Ctrm: July 20, 2011 9:30 a.m. 6 Defendants. The Court, having read and considered the request of counsel for defendant Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., successor by merger to Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, N.A., f/k/a Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, f/k/a defendant World Savings Bank, FSB (“Wells Fargo”) to appear telephonically at the hearing scheduled for July 20, 2011 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 6 of the above-entitled Court, hereby grants permission to appear telephonically. 25 26 Dated: 7/5/2011 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ HON. JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 C:\Documents and Settings\HVine\Desktop\11cv1220.o.7511.doc 1 PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com 2:11-CV-01220-JAM-DAD ORDER RE WELLS FARGO’S APPLICATION TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT HEARING 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the city of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. 5 On the date below I served a copy of the following documents: 6 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: APPLICATION OF DEFENDANT TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE JULY 20, 2011 HEARING 7 8 on all interested parties in said case as follows: 9 Served Electronically via Court’s CM/ECF System: 10 Counsel for Plaintiffs: 11 Kenneth R. Graham, Esq. Law Offices of Kenneth R. Graham 1575 Treat Blvd., Suite 105 Walnut Creek, CA 94598 Tel: (925) 932-0170 12 13 14 Counsel for Defendant 15 CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION 16 Michele Mierzwa michelle.mierzwa@prommis.com Victoria E. Adams Victoria.adams@prommis.com 525 E. Main St. El Cajon, CA 92020 Telephone: (619) 590-9200 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BY MAIL: By placing the envelope for collection and mailing following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with the firm’s practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service in Pasadena, California, in sealed envelopes with postage fully thereon. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California, on June 30, 2011. Christine Daniel (Type or Print Name) /s/ Christine Daniel (Signature of Declarant) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?