California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Stockton Recycling, Inc. et al
Filing
19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/12 ORDERING that defendant Fred Espino is DISMISSED without prejudice from civil case nos. 2:11-CV-0705 LKK CKD and 2:11-cv-1239-LKK CKD, and defendant Paul Faias is DISMISSED without prejudice from civil case no. 2:-11-cv-0705 LKK CKD.(Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Thomas M. Bruen (SBN 63324)
Erik A. Reinertson (SBN 218031)
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN
A Professional Corporation
1990 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: (925) 295-3131
Facsimile:
(925) 295-3132
Email:
tbruen@sbcglobal.net
ereinertson@sbcglobal.net
Attorneys for Defendants STOCKTON
RECYCLING, INC. and JAMES WILLIAMS
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS FRED ESPINO AND PAUL
FAIAS; ORDER
vs.
Before: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual,
and FRED ESPINO, an individual, and PAUL
FAIAS, an individual,
(Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)
Defendants.
17
18
CIV. NO. S-11-705-LKK/CKD
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,
CIV. NO. S-11-1239-LKK/CKD
19
Plaintiff,
20
vs.
21
22
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual,
and FRED ESPINO, an individual,
23
Defendants.
24
25
26
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,
Plaintiff,
27
28
CIV. NO. S-11-1599-LKK/CKD
vs.
1
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
1
2
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, and JAMES WILLIAMS, an
individual,
3
Defendants.
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pursuant to federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff California Sportfishing
Protection Alliance and Defendants Stockton Recycling, Inc. and James Williams, constituting all
of the parties who have appeared in this action, stipulate as follows:
1.
To the dismissal of Defendants Fred Espino (“Espino”) and Paul Faias (“Faias”)
from Civil Case No. S-11-705-LKK/CKD without prejudice;
To the dismissal of Defendant Espino from Civil Case No. S-11-1239-LKK/CKD
10
2.
11
without prejudice;
12
3.
13
That Espino and Faias each bear their own costs and fees.
Respectfully submitted,
14
15
Dated: December 15, 2011
16
/s/ Erik M. Roper
(As authorized on Dec. 14, 2011 – L.R. 131)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE
17
18
19
20
LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD
Date: December 15, 2011
21
22
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN
A Professional Corporation
/s/ Thomas Bruen
23
Attorneys for Defendants
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC.
and JAMES WILLIAMS
24
25
26
27
28
2
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
ORDER
1
2
Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that Defendant Fred
3
Espino is dismissed without prejudice from Civil Case Nos. S-11-705-LKK/CKD and S-11-1239-
4
LKK/CKD and that Defendant Paul Faias is dismissed without prejudice from Civil Case No. S-11-
5
705-LKK/CKD.
6
7
Dated: January 9, 2012.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?