Mitchell v. Cate et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/8/2011 ORDERING that the 13 findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full. For the reasons set forth in the 9 Order, filed on September 14, 2011, defendants Cate, Kernan, Chapman, Harkness and Dangler are dismissed from this action.(Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
WESLEY MITCHELL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. CIV-S-11-1240 JAM GGH P
vs.
MATTHEW L. CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On October 17, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections
21
to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
/////
1
1
2
3
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2011, are adopted in full;
and
2. For the reasons set forth in the Order, filed on September 14, 2011 (docket #
4
9), defendants Cate, Kernan, Chapman, Harkness and Dangler are dismissed from this action.
5
DATED: December 8, 2011
6
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?