Mitchell v. Cate et al

Filing 55

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/29/2013 GRANTING defendants' 54 request to conduct plaintiff's deposition via videoconference. Nothing in this order shall be interpreted as requiring the instution in which plaintiff is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
BENJAMIN R. DORE, State Bar No. 274199
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Clark, Davey, Gower,
McDonald, Sanders and Van Leer

8
9

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

12
13

Case No. 2:11-CV-1240 JAM AC (PC)
WESLEY MITCHELL,

14

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff,

15

v.

16
17

MATTHEW L. CATE, et al.,

18

Defendants.

19
20

Defendants’ request to conduct Plaintiff Wesley Mitchell’s deposition via videoconference

21

is granted. Nothing in this Order shall be interpreted as requiring the institution in which Plaintiff

22

is housed to obtain videoconferencing equipment if it is not already available.

23
24

Dated: August 29, 2013

25
26
27

SA2012104001
31765617.doc

28
1
[Proposed] Order (2:11-CV-1240 JAM AC (PC))