Mitchell v. Cate et al

Filing 95

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/12/14 ORDERING that Defendants motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 65 , vacated by Order filed on July 23, 2014, is hereby re-noticed upon the courts calendar, nunc pro tunc, as of July 29, 2 014; The parties need not brief defendants motion further with the exception that plaintiff has until August 28, 2014 to file any response to defendants third amended separate statement of undisputed facts; and Defendants have discharged the show cause order at ECF No. 91 ; no further sanctions will be imposed.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY MITCHELL, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 No. 2: 11-cv-1240 JAM AC P v. MATTHEW L. CATE, et al., ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed on July 23, 2014, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was 19 vacated due to a failure to comply with a court order regarding the filing of documents under seal. 20 ECF No. 91. Defendants were granted seven (7) days to submit the documents for electronic 21 sealing in accordance with Local Rule 141(e)(2)(i) as previously identified in the order of April 22 28, 2014. See ECF No. 81. Defendants were also directed to submit a third amended separate 23 statement of undisputed facts that are complete and with citation to supporting evidence. Finally, 24 defendants were ordered to show cause why further sanctions should not be imposed for the 25 failure to comply with a court order. 26 The court’s review of the case docket demonstrates that defendants have timely complied 27 with the July 23, 2014 order. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment is deemed re- 28 noticed (and not untimely) as of July 29, 2014. In addition, the undersigned finds that 1 1 defendants’ counsel’s response is sufficient to discharge the show cause order without the 2 imposition of further sanctions. 3 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 4 1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 65, vacated by Order filed on 5 July 23, 2014, is hereby re-noticed upon the court’s calendar, nunc pro tunc, as of July 29, 2014; 6 2. The parties need not brief defendants’ motion further with the exception that plaintiff 7 has until August 28, 2014 to file any response to defendants’ third amended separate statement of 8 undisputed facts; and 9 3. Defendants have discharged the show cause order at ECF No. 91; no further sanctions 10 will be imposed. 11 DATED: August 12, 2014 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?