Sierra Pacific Industries, et al v. United States Department of Agriculture

Filing 17

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/27/2011 ORDERING that the deadline for Pltfs Motion for Summary Judgment is 1/4/2012; deadline for Dfts Opposition and Cross-Motion is 1/25/2012; Pltfs reply due 2/15/2012; hearing date is 3/12/2012. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, et al., NO. CIV. S 11-1250 KJM EFB Plaintiffs, 11 v. 12 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 13 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, 14 Defendant. 15 ____________________________________/ 16 An initial scheduling conference was held in this case on October 5, 2011. Having 17 reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Report filed on September 28, 2011 and discussed a schedule 18 for the case with counsel at the hearing, the court makes the following orders: 19 I. 20 SERVICE OF PROCESS All named defendants have been served and no further service is permitted 21 without leave of court, good cause having been shown. 22 II. 23 ADDITIONAL PARTIES/AMENDMENTS/PLEADINGS No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted without 24 leave of court, good cause having been shown. See FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b); Johnson v. Mammoth 25 Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th Cir. 1992). Plaintiff intends to seek leave to amend to 26 confirm that the federal witnesses have all been properly served with trial subpoenas in the state 27 action, and to add one additional witness. 28 ///// 1 III. JURISDICTION/VENUE Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and the Administrative 2 3 Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701. Jurisdiction and venue are not disputed. 4 IV. HEARING SCHEDULE FOR CROSS MOTIONS ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT The parties agree this action will be decided on cross motions for summary 5 6 judgment based on the administrative record. The following dates shall control: 7 Deadline for Defendant to file and serve administrative record: November 4, 2011 8 Deadline for Plaintiffs to object to record: November 23, 2011 9 Deadline for Defendant to respond to any objections: November 30, 2011 10 Deadline for Plaintiffs to reply to any response: December 7, 2011 11 Hearing on any motion regarding objections to record: December 14, 2011 12 Deadline for Plaintiffs to file motion for summary judgment: January 4, 2012 13 Deadline for Defendant to file opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment: January 25, 2012 Deadline for Plaintiffs to file opposition and reply: February 15, 2012 Deadline for Defendant to file reply: February 29, 2012 Hearing date: March 12, 2012 (9:00 am) 14 15 16 17 The court places a presumptive page limit of twenty (20) pages on all moving 18 papers, twenty (20) pages on oppositions, and ten (10) pages for replies. All requests for page 19 limit increases must be made through the courtroom deputy clerk at least fourteen (14) days prior 20 to the filing of the motion. 21 V. MODIFICATION OF STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 22 The parties are reminded that pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil 23 Procedure, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order shall not be modified except by leave of court 24 upon a showing of good cause. Agreement by the parties pursuant to stipulation alone does not 25 constitute good cause. Except in extraordinary circumstances, unavailability of witnesses or 26 counsel does not constitute good cause. 27 ///// 28 2 1 VI. 2 OBJECTIONS TO STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER This Status Order will become final without further order of the court unless 3 objections are filed within fourteen (14) calendar days of service of this Order. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 DATED: October 27, 2011. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?