Hedgcoth v. Social Security et al

Filing 4

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/15/11. F&R referred to Judge Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

WILLIAM JOSEPH HEDGCOTH,

11
12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-11-1256 GEB GGH PS

vs.
SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

16

By order filed July 8, 2011, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight

17

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. In that order, the court informed plaintiff

18

of the deficiencies in his complaint. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff

19

has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20

Plaintiff has apparently decided to rest on the dismissed complaint. For the

21

reasons given in the July 8, 2011, order, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

22

dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

24

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen

25

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

26

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1

1

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

3

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: September 15, 2011

5
6

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
GGH:076/Hedgcoth1256.fta.wpd

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2