McCain v. California Highway Patrol et al
Filing
205
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/18/15: Ex parte motion 196 is DENIED. Motion to compel 190 is VACATED without prejudice to refiling. Motion to modify the scheduling order 198 is GRANTED. Discovery deadline is continued to 3/1/2016. Law and motion deadline is continued to 5/30/16. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TERRYLYN MCCAIN,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:11-cv-01265-KJM-AC
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
MANGHAM, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Currently pending before the court are defendants Mike’s Towing Service and Michael D.
18
Olivarez’s (“Towing Defendants”) ex parte motion “to continue consideration” of their motion to
19
compel, ECF No. 196, and defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 198. For
20
reasons discussed below, the court will deny the first motion and grant the second.
21
On December 2, 2015, the Towing Defendants file a motion to compel further discovery
22
responses. ECF No. 190. Because plaintiff is presently incarcerated, the motion was not noticed
23
for hearing. See Local Rule 230(l). The Towing Defendants now request that the court continue:
24
(1) the Tow Defendants pending Motion to Compel (with no set
hearing date, per Local Rule 230(l)), with the opportunity to amend
and refile based on recently promised initial and further responses
to discovery, as discussed herein; and (2) any Motion to Compel by
Plaintiff which may be duly filed and currently pending, per
agreements reached at deposition of Plaintiff on Dec. 8, 2015.
25
26
27
28
ECF No. 196 at 2. It appears that defendants are asking the court to refrain from deciding their
1
1
motion until further notice, because they believe plaintiff may yet provide documents responsive
2
to their requests. Under these circumstances, the proper course is for defendants to withdraw
3
their motion. As to the Towing Defendants’ request to continue consideration of “any Motion to
4
Compel by Plaintiff which may be duly filed and currently pending,” the docket reflects no such
5
motions. To the extent that the Towing Defendants are prospectively requesting the court defer
6
consideration of motions plaintiff may file in the future, the request is improper. For these
7
reasons, the court will deny the Towing Defendants’ motion. However, in light of the Towing
8
Defendants’ representations regarding the status of the discovery dispute, their motion to compel
9
will be vacated without prejudice to refiling.
10
All Defendants jointly requests that the court modify its pretrial scheduling order to allow
11
more time for discovery. ECF No. 198 at 2. Specifically, defendants state that the Towing
12
Defendants conferred with plaintiff during their December 8, 2015, deposition. Id. Based on
13
plaintiff’s representations during that meeting defendants expect they will receive further
14
discovery responses from plaintiff. Id. Accordingly, defendants request that the court continue
15
the discovery deadline to March 1, 2016, and the law and motion deadline to May 30, 2016. See
16
id. (requesting that the court continue the foregoing deadlines sixty days).1 The court finds that
17
defendants have shown good cause for the granting of an extension of the foregoing deadlines.
18
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Accordingly, the court will grant the defendants’ motion.
19
In accordance with the foregoing, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that:
20
1. The Towing Defendants’ ex parte motion, ECF No. 196, is DENIED;
21
2. The Towing Defendant’s pending motion to compel, ECF No. 190, is VACATED
22
without prejudice to refiling; and
23
////
24
////
25
////
26
27
28
1
Later on, defendants request that both the discovery deadline and the law and motion deadline
be continued to March 31, 2016. ECF No. 198 at 3. The court can only assume, however, that
this is a typo.
2
1
3. Defendants’ motion to modify the scheduling order, ECF No. 198, is GRANTED.
2
The parties’ discovery deadline is continued to March 1, 2016, and their law and
3
motion deadline is continued to May 30, 2016.
4
DATED: December 18, 2015
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?