Boals v. Rash Curtis & Associates

Filing 22

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 6 Mark E. Ellis - 127159 Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524 Lindsey N. Heaton - 269688 ELLIS LAW GROUP, LLP 740 University Avenue, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 283-8820 Fax: (916) 283-8821 mellis@ellislawgrp.com asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com lheaton@ellislawgrp.com 7 Attorneys for Defendant RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES 2 3 4 5 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 DANIEL BOALS, 14 Case No.: 11-CV-01285-JAM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 15 v. 16 RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that based upon the stipulation of the parties, the above-captioned 21 action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), and thus the matter is dismissed. 22 Dated: October 15, 2012 23 /s/ John A. Mendez________________________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 24 25 26 27 28 -1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ [PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?