Boals v. Rash Curtis & Associates
Filing
22
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
1
6
Mark E. Ellis - 127159
Andrew M. Steinheimer - 200524
Lindsey N. Heaton - 269688
ELLIS LAW GROUP, LLP
740 University Avenue, Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: (916) 283-8820
Fax: (916) 283-8821
mellis@ellislawgrp.com
asteinheimer@ellislawgrp.com
lheaton@ellislawgrp.com
7
Attorneys for Defendant RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
12
13
DANIEL BOALS,
14
Case No.: 11-CV-01285-JAM-CKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
15
v.
16
RASH CURTIS & ASSOCIATES,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that based upon the stipulation of the parties, the above-captioned
21
action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), and thus the matter is dismissed.
22
Dated: October 15, 2012
23
/s/ John A. Mendez________________________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
24
25
26
27
28
-1______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
[PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?