Mason v. Mercy Medical Center et al
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/12/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Request for the Appointment of Counsel 10 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOSHUA LEWIS MASON,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. CIV S-11-1309-CMK-P
vs.
ORDER
MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
/
17
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to
18
42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel
19
(Doc. 10). The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to
20
require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. See Mallard v. United States
21
Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may
22
request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). See Terrell v.
23
Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36
24
(9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not at this time find the required exceptional
25
circumstances.
26
///
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the
appointment of counsel (Doc. 10) is denied.
3
4
5
6
DATED: September 12, 2011
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?