Mason v. Mercy Medical Center et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/14/2011 DENYING, as unnecessary, plaintiff's 14 motion for leave to amend; and plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA LEWIS MASON, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. CIV S-11-1309-CMK-P vs. ORDER MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for leave to amend (Doc. 19 14). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1), a party may amend his pleading once 20 as a matter of right at any time before being served with a responsive pleading. A review of the 21 docket reflects that no responsive pleading has been served. Therefore, as with plaintiff’s prior 22 such motion, plaintiff’s motion is denied as unnecessary. Leave of court is not required to amend 23 the complaint at this time. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 1 A further review of the docket shows that plaintiff has not responded to the 2 court’s August 22, 2011, order dismissing the original complaint and directing plaintiff to file an 3 amended complaint. Plaintiff will be given one further opportunity to comply and is reminded 4 that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the entire action. See Local Rule 110. Plaintiff 5 is also cautioned that compliance consists of filing an amended complaint and not a third motion 6 for leave to amend. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. 14) is denied as unnecessary; 2. Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this 9 and 10 11 order. 12 13 14 15 DATED: November 14, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?