Price v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation, et al
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/12/12 ORDERING that 22 Motion for a court order for photocopies is GRANTED; 23 Motion for Extension of time is GRANTED and respondents have until January 25, 2012 to file their responsive pleading.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
GABRIEL PRICE,
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
13
14
No. CIV S-11-1315 KJM EFB P
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT
OF CORRECTIONS AND
REHABILITATION, et al.,
Respondents.
15
ORDER
/
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28
18
U.S.C. § 2254. He has filed a request seeking a court order entitling him to photocopies of his
19
legal documents. Dckt. No. 22. He states that he is being denied access to the courts, as he has
20
been unable to make copies of documentary evidence in support of his habeas petition. He
21
attaches copies of his prison’s rules regarding photocopies for inmates.
22
Petitioner is entitled to make copies of filings and exhibits in this case. Petitioner may
23
show this court order to anyone who hinders his access to the courts. If he is still prevented from
24
making the necessary photocopies, he may inform the court of the names of the people who are
25
preventing him from photocopying documents as well as the attendant circumstances.
26
////
1
1
2
Respondents have requested an extension of time to file a responsive pleading. See Fed.
R. Civ. P. 6(b).
3
Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that:
4
1. Petitioner’s motion for a court order for photocopies is granted; and
5
2. Respondents’ December 21, 2011 request is granted and respondents have until
6
January 25, 2012 to file their responsive pleading.
7
Dated: January 12, 2012.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?