Thompson v. Dickinson
Filing
33
ORDER denying 32 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/20/12. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
PHILLIP ARTHUR THOMPSON,
9
10
11
Petitioner,
No. 2:11-cv-1318 GEB AC P
vs.
KATHLEEN DICKINSON,
12
Respondent.
ORDER
/
13
Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no
14
15
absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d
16
453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at
17
any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing
18
§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be
19
served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s December 12, 2012
20
21
motion for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 32) is denied without prejudice to a renewal of
22
the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.
23
DATED: December 20, 2012.
24
`
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
25
26
mp;mb;thom1318.110
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?