Thompson v. Dickinson

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 08/27/14 ordering that not further action will be taken on petitioner's motions 44 and 45 . (cc: USCA, 9th circuit) (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

PHILLIP ARTHUR THOMPSON,

11
12
13
14

No. 2:11-cv-01318 GEB AC P

Petitioner,
v.

ORDER

KATHLEEN DICKINSON,
Respondent.

15
16

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has appealed this court’s denial of his

17

petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 41 (notice of appeal).

18

Thereafter, on August 22 and 25, 2014, petitioner filed motions to proceed in forma pauperis on

19

appeal. ECF Nos. 44 and 45. Petitioner is advised that the court has forwarded each motion to

20

the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for further action as this court was divested of jurisdiction

21

once petitioner filed his notice of appeal. See Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459

22

U.S. 56, 58 (1982) (per curiam).

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no further action will be taken on

24

petitioner’s motions.

25

DATED: August 27, 2014

26
27
28
1