CytoSport, Inc. v. Proclaim Nutrition, LLC
Filing
13
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/1/2011 12 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 1/30/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. (Duong, D)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (SBN 126173)
MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210
Roseville, CA 95661
Telephone: (916) 780-8222
Fax No: (916) 780-8775
Jed H. Hansen (SBN 10679)
THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P.
8180 South 700 East, Suite 350
Sandy, Utah 84070-0562
Telephone: (801) 566-6633
Facsimile: (801) 566-0750
Mark M. Bettilyon (SBN 4798)
Samuel C. Straight (SBN 7638)
RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER, PC
36 South State Street, Suite 1400
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: (801) 532-1500
Fax No: (801) 532-7543
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CytoSport, Inc.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
CYTOSPORT, INC., a California
corporation,
19
20
21
22
Plaintiff,
vs.
PROCLAIM NUTRITION, LLC, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company,
Defendant.
23
24
25
Case No.: 2:11-CV-01323-FCD-KJN
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
______________________________________
DATE: November 14, 2011
TIME: 9:00 a.m.
CTRM.: 10
United States District Judge
Garland E. Burrell, Jr.
26
27
///
28
///
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
3
APPLICATION
By minute order dated September 1, 2011, this matter was set for an Initial Scheduling
Conference to be heard on November 14, 2011 at 9:00 a.m.
4
Immediately after this action was filed, Defendant was contacted regarding potential
5
settlement of the action. A settlement dialogue ensued, and has continued in earnest since the initial
6
contact was made. Those discussions have matured to the point where a settlement agreement has
7
been drafted by Plaintiff’s counsel and will soon be submitted to Defendant for review and
8
consideration.
9
appearance by Defendant. While recognizing that we are in arrears of the court-ordered schedule for
10
a Joint Status Report, we believe that these circumstances warrant a 45-day postponement of the
11
Pretrial Scheduling Conference, and respectfully request that the Court order that the scheduling
12
conference be continued for approximately 45 days. We are hopeful that a voluntary dismissal will
13
precede the new conference date.
14
DATED: October 28, 2011
15
We are hopeful that the matter will be resolved without the necessity of an
Jed H. Hansen
THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P.
16
-and17
18
MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
Attorneys at Law
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Glenn W. Peterson
GLENN W. PETERSON
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CytoSport, Inc.
I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a
"conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.
MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP
/s/ Glenn W. Peterson
26
27
28
2
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
1
ORDER
2
Based upon the foregoing application, and good cause appearing, the Status (Pretrial
3
Scheduling) Conference in this matter is continued to January 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status
4
report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing.
5
SO ORDERED.
6
Date: 11/1/2011
7
_________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
DEAC_Signature-END:
12
13
61khh4bb
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?