CytoSport, Inc. v. Proclaim Nutrition, LLC

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 11/1/2011 12 ORDERING that the Status Conference is CONTINUED to 1/30/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Glenn W. Peterson, Esq. (SBN 126173) MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP 2267 Lava Ridge Court, Suite 210 Roseville, CA 95661 Telephone: (916) 780-8222 Fax No: (916) 780-8775 Jed H. Hansen (SBN 10679) THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. 8180 South 700 East, Suite 350 Sandy, Utah 84070-0562 Telephone: (801) 566-6633 Facsimile: (801) 566-0750 Mark M. Bettilyon (SBN 4798) Samuel C. Straight (SBN 7638) RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER, PC 36 South State Street, Suite 1400 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-1500 Fax No: (801) 532-7543 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 CYTOSPORT, INC., a California corporation, 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. PROCLAIM NUTRITION, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company, Defendant. 23 24 25 Case No.: 2:11-CV-01323-FCD-KJN APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ______________________________________ DATE: November 14, 2011 TIME: 9:00 a.m. CTRM.: 10 United States District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 26 27 /// 28 /// APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 APPLICATION By minute order dated September 1, 2011, this matter was set for an Initial Scheduling Conference to be heard on November 14, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. 4 Immediately after this action was filed, Defendant was contacted regarding potential 5 settlement of the action. A settlement dialogue ensued, and has continued in earnest since the initial 6 contact was made. Those discussions have matured to the point where a settlement agreement has 7 been drafted by Plaintiff’s counsel and will soon be submitted to Defendant for review and 8 consideration. 9 appearance by Defendant. While recognizing that we are in arrears of the court-ordered schedule for 10 a Joint Status Report, we believe that these circumstances warrant a 45-day postponement of the 11 Pretrial Scheduling Conference, and respectfully request that the Court order that the scheduling 12 conference be continued for approximately 45 days. We are hopeful that a voluntary dismissal will 13 precede the new conference date. 14 DATED: October 28, 2011 15 We are hopeful that the matter will be resolved without the necessity of an Jed H. Hansen THORPE NORTH & WESTERN, L.L.P. 16 -and17 18 MILLSTONE, PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Glenn W. Peterson GLENN W. PETERSON Attorneys for Plaintiff CytoSport, Inc. I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP /s/ Glenn W. Peterson 26 27 28 2 APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER 2 Based upon the foregoing application, and good cause appearing, the Status (Pretrial 3 Scheduling) Conference in this matter is continued to January 30, 2012, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status 4 report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing. 5 SO ORDERED. 6 Date: 11/1/2011 7 _________________________ GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 DEAC_Signature-END: 12 13 61khh4bb 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 APPLICATION TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?