Hawkins et al v. First Horizon Home Loans et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/18/11 ORDERING that Defendant shall file a Notice of Related Case in 2:10-cv-01876 no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. Alternatively, Defendant shall show cause why a sanction should not be imp osed for its failure to comply with the June 1, 2011 Order and Local Rule 123 ("OSC") in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. If a hearing is desired on the OSC, it shall be requested in the above referenced filing. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ERIC HAWKINS SR., and LYNDA P. HAWKINS, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiffs, v. FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS, a division of First Tennessee Bank N.A., successor in interest by merger to First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, a Tennessee corporation; FORT KNOX LENDING, a California business entity form unknown; CALIFORNIA HOME AND MORTGAGE, a California business entity form unknown; JAMES JABAUT, an individual; LOANGUY.COM, a California corporation; SOUTH BAY REALTY, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 2-10, Defendants. ________________________________ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-cv-01325-GEB-EFB ORDER 21 An Order filed June 1, 2011, required “a party [to] file a 22 Notice of Related Cases document no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 6, 23 2011, in each action opined to be related” because of representations 24 Defendant First Horizon Home Loans made in a dismissal motion. (ECF No. 25 10 (emphasis added).) 26 filed a Notice of Related Cases in this action on June 6, 2011 (ECF No. 27 11); however, it did not file the required notice in the case stated to Defendant First Horizon Home Loans (“Defendant”) 28 1 1 be related, Hawkins, et al., v. First Horizon Home Loans, et al., Case 2 No. 2:10-cv-01876-FCD/KJM-GGH (“Hawkins I”). 3 Therefore, Defendant shall file a Notice of Related Case in 4 2:10-cv-01876 no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. Alternatively, 5 Defendant shall show cause why a sanction should not be imposed for its 6 failure to comply with the June 1, 2011 Order and Local Rule 123 (“OSC”) 7 in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. If a hearing 8 is desired on the OSC, it shall be requested in the above referenced 9 filing. 10 Dated: July 18, 2011 11 12 13 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?