Hawkins et al v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/18/11 ORDERING that Defendant shall file a Notice of Related Case in 2:10-cv-01876 no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. Alternatively, Defendant shall show cause why a sanction should not be imp osed for its failure to comply with the June 1, 2011 Order and Local Rule 123 ("OSC") in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. If a hearing is desired on the OSC, it shall be requested in the above referenced filing. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
ERIC HAWKINS SR., and
LYNDA P. HAWKINS,
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Plaintiffs,
v.
FIRST HORIZON HOME LOANS, a
division of First Tennessee Bank
N.A., successor in interest by
merger to First Horizon Home
Loan Corporation, a Tennessee
corporation; FORT KNOX LENDING,
a California business entity
form unknown; CALIFORNIA HOME
AND MORTGAGE, a California
business entity form unknown;
JAMES JABAUT, an individual;
LOANGUY.COM, a California
corporation; SOUTH BAY REALTY,
INC., a California corporation;
and DOES 2-10,
Defendants.
________________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:11-cv-01325-GEB-EFB
ORDER
21
An Order filed June 1, 2011, required “a party [to] file a
22
Notice of Related Cases document no later than 4:00 p.m. on June 6,
23
2011, in each action opined to be related” because of representations
24
Defendant First Horizon Home Loans made in a dismissal motion. (ECF No.
25
10 (emphasis added).)
26
filed a Notice of Related Cases in this action on June 6, 2011 (ECF No.
27
11); however, it did not file the required notice in the case stated to
Defendant First Horizon Home Loans (“Defendant”)
28
1
1
be related, Hawkins, et al., v. First Horizon Home Loans, et al., Case
2
No. 2:10-cv-01876-FCD/KJM-GGH (“Hawkins I”).
3
Therefore, Defendant shall file a Notice of Related Case in
4
2:10-cv-01876 no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. Alternatively,
5
Defendant shall show cause why a sanction should not be imposed for its
6
failure to comply with the June 1, 2011 Order and Local Rule 123 (“OSC”)
7
in a filing due no later than 4:00 p.m. on July 20, 2011. If a hearing
8
is desired on the OSC, it shall be requested in the above referenced
9
filing.
10
Dated:
July 18, 2011
11
12
13
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?