Craver v. Hasty et al
Filing
119
ORDER adopting 114 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/21/14: Plaintiff's motion for federal protection 108 , construed as a motion for injunctive relief, is denied. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANDRE CRAVER,
12
No. 2:11-cv-1344 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
J. HASTY, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 10, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
21
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
22
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
25
court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
26
court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
27
analysis.
28
/////
1
1
The undersigned agrees with the magistrate judge that injunctive relief pursuant to the All
2
Writs Act is not warranted. Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief concerns conditions at
3
California State Prison-Lancaster (“Lancaster”). Lancaster is located within the jurisdiction of
4
the United States District Court for the Central District of California. As Plaintiff has previously
5
been advised, his claims regarding conditions at Lancaster should be raised in a civil rights action
6
filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
7
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
8
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 10, 2014, are adopted in full; and
9
2. Plaintiff’s motion for federal protection (ECF No. 108), construed as a motion for
10
injunctive relief, is denied.
11
12
Dated: August 21, 2014
13
14
15
16
17
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?