Craver v. Hasty et al

Filing 119

ORDER adopting 114 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/21/14: Plaintiff's motion for federal protection 108 , construed as a motion for injunctive relief, is denied. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE CRAVER, 12 No. 2:11-cv-1344 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 J. HASTY, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 10, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 The undersigned agrees with the magistrate judge that injunctive relief pursuant to the All 2 Writs Act is not warranted. Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief concerns conditions at 3 California State Prison-Lancaster (“Lancaster”). Lancaster is located within the jurisdiction of 4 the United States District Court for the Central District of California. As Plaintiff has previously 5 been advised, his claims regarding conditions at Lancaster should be raised in a civil rights action 6 filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 7 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 8 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 10, 2014, are adopted in full; and 9 2. Plaintiff’s motion for federal protection (ECF No. 108), construed as a motion for 10 injunctive relief, is denied. 11 12 Dated: August 21, 2014 13 14 15 16 17 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?