Craver v. Hasty et al
Filing
163
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 09/14/2015: Court GRANTS parties Notice of Settlement 162 ; the current final pretrial date and trial dates will remain in effect pending Plaintiff's receipt fo settlement proceeds and the execution of an appropriate stipulation of dismissal. Judge McNamee will retain jurisdication over this matter until completion.(Streeter, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
Andre Craver,
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
12
J. Hasty, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 2:11-1334-PHX-SMM
ORDER
15
Pending before the Court is the parties’ Notice of Settlement. (Doc. 162.) The parties
16
have notified the Court that they have reached a settlement as to all claims between them in
17
this action and are in the process of finalizing settlement documents. (Id. at 1-2.) Pursuant
18
to the parties’ notice and good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING the parties’ Notice of Settlement. (Doc.
19
20
162.)
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the current final pretrial date of Monday,
22
February 1, 2016 and the trial date of Tuesday, February 2, 2016, will remain in effect
23
pending Plaintiff’s receipt of settlement proceeds and the execution of an appropriate
24
stipulation for dismissal. Should settlement proceeds not be delivered to Plaintiff by the time
25
set for final pretrial and trial, the Court will permit a motion to continue these dates to be
26
filed.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that having been designated by the Ninth Circuit
28
Court of Appeals to handle this matter (Doc. 154), the Court will maintain jurisdiction over
1
this matter until its completion.
DATED this 14th day of September, 2015.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cc:
United States District Judge Troy L. Nunley
Sandy Andrews, Circuit Executive’s Office, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?