Craver v. Hasty et al
Filing
166
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee on 12/22/15 ORDERING that defendants shall repsond to plaintiff's 164 Motion for Order notifying CDCR that $200 of $3500 Settlement is free of any restitution by 01/29/16; the Court wil l not require plaintiff to reply. The Final Pretrial Conference is RESETt for 3/21/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 3 before Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee and the Jury Trial is RESET for 3/22/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 before Senior Judge Stephen M. McNamee, pending the execution of an appropriate stipulation for dismissal. (Benson, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
Andre Craver,
No. CV 2:11-1344-PHX-SMM
Plaintiff,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER
J. Hasty, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Order the Defendants to Notify
16
CDCR that $200.00 of the $3,500 Settlement is Free of Any Restitution Obligation
17
Because $200.00 is Property Re-Imbursement P.C. § 2085.5 CCR Title 15. (Doc. 164.)
18
This motion was filed after the parties notified the Court that they had reached a
19
settlement agreement, so no stipulation for dismissal was filed. Defendants have yet to
20
respond.
21
Accordingly,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall respond to Plaintiff’s Motion
23
(Doc. 164) by Friday, January 29, 2016. The Court will not require Plaintiff to file a
24
reply.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the current final pretrial date of Monday
26
February 1, 2016 and the trial date of Tuesday, February 2, 2016, are vacated. The new
27
final pretrial date shall be March 21, 2016 with a new trial date of March 22, 2016,
28
///
1
2
pending the execution of an appropriate stipulation for dismissal.
Dated this 22nd day of December, 2015.
3
4
5
Honorable Stephen M. McNamee
Senior United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?