Craver v. Hasty et al
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/27/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' motion to dismiss # 22 is DENIED; and within 21 of the date of this order, defendants shall file an answer to the complaint. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANDRE CRAVER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:11-cv-1344-MCE-KJN-P
J. HASTY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On January 19, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither
22
party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
26
////
1
1
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2012 (ECF No. 32), are
ADOPTED in full;
3
2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is DENIED; and
4
3. Within twenty days of the date of this order, defendants shall file an answer to
5
6
the complaint.
Dated: February 27, 2012
7
8
9
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?