Craver v. Hasty et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 2/27/2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 32 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' motion to dismiss # 22 is DENIED; and within 21 of the date of this order, defendants shall file an answer to the complaint. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE CRAVER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-1344-MCE-KJN-P J. HASTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On January 19, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither 22 party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 19, 2012 (ECF No. 32), are ADOPTED in full; 3 2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is DENIED; and 4 3. Within twenty days of the date of this order, defendants shall file an answer to 5 6 the complaint. Dated: February 27, 2012 7 8 9 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?