Craver v. Hasty et al
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/15/2012 ORDERING that the 35 findings and recommendations filed 3/2/2012 are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 33 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANDRE CRAVER,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P
J. HASTY, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
17
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
18
Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
19
On March 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
20
herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any
21
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days.
22
Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule
24
304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the
25
entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and
26
by proper analysis.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2012 (ECF No. 35), are
3
4
ADOPTED in full; and
2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 33) is DENIED.
5
6
7
8
Dated: April 15, 2012
________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?