Craver v. Hasty et al

Filing 45

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/15/2012 ORDERING that the 35 findings and recommendations filed 3/2/2012 are ADOPTED in full. Plaintiff's 33 motion for injunctive relief is DENIED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE CRAVER, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 No. 2:11-cv-1344 MCE KJN P J. HASTY, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 ORDER / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On March 2, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any 21 objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. 22 Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 24 304, this Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 25 entire file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and 26 by proper analysis. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2012 (ECF No. 35), are 3 4 ADOPTED in full; and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 33) is DENIED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: April 15, 2012 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?