Bunn v. Lopez et al

Filing 36

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/13/2012 VACATING the 11/16/2012 status conference; petitioner shall file a supplemental brief addressing the merits of his habeas claims by 1/18/2013; respondent shall file a supplemental brief by 2/19/2013; and this matter will thereafter stand submitted for decision.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD THOMAS BUNN, JR., Petitioner, 11 vs. 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-1373 MCE DAD P RAUL LOPEZ, Respondent. 14 ORDER / 15 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ 16 17 of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. By order dated October 16, 2012, a status 18 conference was scheduled for November 16, 2012, and the parties were advised to file a joint 19 status report by November 13, 2012 if they had reached agreement as to how this matter should 20 proceed and be scheduled. The parties filed their joint status report on October 30, 2012. 21 Therein, the parties suggest a schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs on the merits of 22 petitioner’s claims contained in the instant habeas petition. The parties also request that the 23 November 16, 2012 status conference be taken off calendar in light of their agreed upon 24 schedule. 25 ///// 26 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that: 2 1. The status conference currently scheduled for November 16, 2012 is vacated; 3 2. Petitioner shall file a supplemental brief addressing the merits of his habeas 4 claims by January 18, 2013; 5 3. Respondent shall file a supplemental brief by February 19, 2013; and 6 4. This matter will thereafter stand submitted for decision. 7 DATED: November 13, 2012. 8 9 10 11 12 DAD:8 bunn1373.vac 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?