Reynolds v. State of California Department of Fish and Game

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/12/11 ORDERING upon review of the amended complaint, the court also finds that it is appropriate for service on all defendants. Plaintiff shall effect service of the amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOHN REYNOLDS, 9 10 11 12 Plaintiff, vs. ORDER STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendant. 13 14 15 16 No. CIV S-11-1381-MCE-CMK / Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint (Doc. 14). This order amends the court’s June 16, 2011, order in light of the filing of the 17 amended complaint. In the June 16, 2011, order, the court determined that service of the original 18 complaint was appropriate for all defendants. Thereafter, plaintiff effected service of the 19 complaint. Upon review of the amended complaint, the court also finds that it is appropriate for 20 service on all defendants. Plaintiff shall effect service of the amended complaint pursuant to 21 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. 22 23 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 12, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?