LaMark v. Jas Man Rhea Enterprises et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 8/31/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint; Defendant JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES shall not be required to file an Answer to the Amended Complaint, their Answer filed 7/15/11, is accepted as responsive to the Amended Complaint. (Becknal, R)

Jason K. Singleton, State Bar #166170
1

[e-mail]

2

SINGLETON LAW GROUP
611 “L” Street, Suite A
Eureka, CA 95501

3
4

[phone]
FAX [phone]

5
6

Attorney for Plaintiff, JOSHUA LAMARK

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES, a
California corporation, MANJIT SANDHU, )
)
MOHINDER SANDHU ETAL,”LP”, a
)
California Limited Partnership, dba
)
AUBURN GAS & FOOD, and DOES ONE to )
)
FIFTY, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
JOSHUA LAMARK,

Case No. 2:11-CV-1406 MCE EFB
STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;
ORDER THEREON

18
19

In reviewing his file, Plaintiff’s counsel discovered his staff had made a clerical error in

20

preparing the Complaint filed in this matter, specifically, paragraph 4 which lists the barriers to

21

access which Plaintiff encountered at the facility which is the subject of this action has

22

incorrect information in it. Plaintiff’s counsel’s office staff inadvertently inserted a list of access

23

barriers from a report prepared by the access consultant for a different facility.

24

Plaintiff desires to file a First Amended Complaint to correct Paragraph 4 inserting the

25

barriers to access encountered by Plaintiff at Auburn Gas & Food, the facility which is the

26

subject of this action, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.”

27

Defendant Jas Man Rhea Enterprises stipulates that Plaintiff may file the First Amended

28

Complaint and that Defendant Jas Man Rhea Enterprises shall not be required to file an
STIPULATION FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT

1

2:11-CV-1406 MCE EFB

1

answer to the First Amended Complaint, their Answer filed July 15, 2011, as Document 7 is

2

accepted as responsive to the First Amended Complaint.
It is so stipulated.

3

SINGLETON LAW GROUP

4
5

Dated:

August 31, 2011

/s/ Jason K. Singleton
Jason K. Singleton, Attorney for
Plaintiff, JOSHUA LAMARK

6
7

VAUGHAN & ASSOCIATES

8
9
Dated:

August 24, 2011

/s/ Cris C. Vaughan
Cris C. Vaughan, Attorneys for
Defendant JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES

10
11
12

ORDER

13

Based on the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing,

14

1.

Plaintiff may file a First Amended Complaint.

15

2.

Defendant JAS MAN RHEA ENTERPRISES shall not be required to file an

16

Answer to the Amended Complaint, their Answer filed July 15, 2011, is accepted as responsive

17

to the Amended Complaint.

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Dated: August 31, 2011

20
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21
22
23
DEAC_Signature-END:

24
25
26
27

c4d6b0d3

28
STIPULATION FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT

2

2:11-CV-1406 MCE EFB