Ross v. Total Card, Inc.
Filing
10
ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/8/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)
1
2
3
ATTORNEY DEBT RESET, INC.
Jeremy G. Winter, SBN 245631
Robert S. Gimblin, SBN 272044
1300 Ethan Way, Ste. 125
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: 916-446-1791
Facsimile: 916-446-1742
4
Attorneys for Plaintiff(s)
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION
8
9
Case No. 2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD
BARNEY VICTOR ROSS,
10
11
12
JOINT NOTICE REGARDING
SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR
ORDER REMOVING CURRENT
DEADLINES AND FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
v.
13
14
Judge: WILLIAM B. SHUBB
TOTAL CARD, INC.,
15
Defendant(s).
16
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
17
Plaintiff BARNEY VICTOR ROSS and Defendant TOTAL CARD, INC.
18
19
(collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby notify the
20
Court that the Parties have reached settlement of the above-entitled matter. The Parties
21
hereby request that the Court vacate all pending due dates and hearings and dismiss this
22
action with prejudice.
23
////
////
24
Respectfully Submitted,
25
-1JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER
2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD
1
Dated: AUGUST 3, 2011
2
Attorney Debt Reset
Jeremy Gordon Winter
Robert Steven Gimblin, II
3
By: /s/ Robert Steven Gimblin, II
Robert Steven Gimblin, II
Attorney for Plaintiff
BARNEY VICTOR ROSS
4
5
6
7
Dated: AUGUST 3, 2011
8
David I. Dalby
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
9
10
By: /s/ David I. Dalby
David I. Dalby
Attorney for Defendant
TOTAL CARD, INC
11
12
13
ORDER
14
15
16
17
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, all dates and
hearings are hereby vacated and the case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
August 8, 2011
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
-2JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER
2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?