Ross v. Total Card, Inc.

Filing 10

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 8/8/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Duong, D)

Download PDF
1 2 3 ATTORNEY DEBT RESET, INC. Jeremy G. Winter, SBN 245631 Robert S. Gimblin, SBN 272044 1300 Ethan Way, Ste. 125 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: 916-446-1791 Facsimile: 916-446-1742 4 Attorneys for Plaintiff(s) 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION 8 9 Case No. 2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD BARNEY VICTOR ROSS, 10 11 12 JOINT NOTICE REGARDING SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ORDER REMOVING CURRENT DEADLINES AND FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER Plaintiff(s), v. 13 14 Judge: WILLIAM B. SHUBB TOTAL CARD, INC., 15 Defendant(s). 16 NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT 17 Plaintiff BARNEY VICTOR ROSS and Defendant TOTAL CARD, INC. 18 19 (collectively, “the Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby notify the 20 Court that the Parties have reached settlement of the above-entitled matter. The Parties 21 hereby request that the Court vacate all pending due dates and hearings and dismiss this 22 action with prejudice. 23 //// //// 24 Respectfully Submitted, 25 -1JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER 2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD 1 Dated: AUGUST 3, 2011 2 Attorney Debt Reset Jeremy Gordon Winter Robert Steven Gimblin, II 3 By: /s/ Robert Steven Gimblin, II Robert Steven Gimblin, II Attorney for Plaintiff BARNEY VICTOR ROSS 4 5 6 7 Dated: AUGUST 3, 2011 8 David I. Dalby Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP 9 10 By: /s/ David I. Dalby David I. Dalby Attorney for Defendant TOTAL CARD, INC 11 12 13 ORDER 14 15 16 17 Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, and good cause appearing, all dates and hearings are hereby vacated and the case is hereby dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 August 8, 2011 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -2JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT/REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; PROPOSED ORDER 2:11-cv-01429-WBS-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?