Nath vs Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 01/31/12 ORDERING that defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, up to 03/12/12, to file the responsive brief. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
ARMAND D. ROTH
Special Assistant United States Attorney
California Bar No. 214624
6
333 Market Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8924
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
E-Mail:Armand.Roth@ssa.gov
7
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant Commissioner of Social Security
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
PRAVEENA DEVI NATH,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
_________________________________)
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
\\\\\
CIVIL NO. 11-cv-01441-GGH
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE BRIEF
1
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned for the respective parties, subject to the
2
approval of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension of time, up to March 12, 2012,
3
to file the responsive brief. This is Defendant’s first request. This extension is requested because
4
Defendant’s counsel needs additional time due to an unusually heavy workload.
5
Respectfully submitted on January 31, 2012,
6
/s/ Bess M. Brewer *
BESS M. BREWER
Plaintiff’s Attorney
* by Armand Roth by email authorization of 1/17/12
7
8
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX,
Social Security Administration
9
10
11
13
/s/ ARMAND D. ROTH
ARMAND D. ROTH)
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
14
Attorneys for Defendant
12
15
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DATED January 31, 2012
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?