Jayne v. Van Buskirk, et al.

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 9/27/2011 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 are ADOPTED in FULL; plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief # 11 is DENIED as MOOT. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKE JAYNE, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. 2:11-cv-1448-GEB-KJN-P vs. DONALD VAN BUSKIRK, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 17 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 18 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 19 On August 8, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations 20 herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections 21 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not 22 filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be 24 supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 25 ORDERED that: 26 //// 1 1 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2011, are adopted in full; and 3 2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 11) is denied as moot. 4 DATED: 5 Dated: September 27, 2011 6 7 8 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?