Jayne v. City of Anderson et al
Filing
16
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/08/12 recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MIKE JAYNE,
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
vs.
CITY OF ANDERSON, et al.
Defendants.
15
16
No. CIV S-11-1465 LKK GGH P
FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/
By orders filed August 24, 2011 and November 18, 2011, the court granted
17
plaintiff twenty-eight days to file an amended complaint. Each order informed plaintiff of the
18
deficiencies in his complaint.
19
The court’s November 13, 2011 order, sent to the plaintiff at Snake River
20
Correctional Institution, his address of record, was returned as “Undeliverable: Paroled.”
21
Subsequently, on December 5, 2011, plaintiff moved for an extension of time to comply with the
22
November 13, 2011 order, advising the court that he was attempting to secure counsel. The
23
return address provided by plaintiff on his December 5th motion was a post office box in Bella
24
Vista, California.
25
26
By order dated December 20, 2011, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for an
extension of time, and directed that plaintiff file his amended complaint within thirty days. The
1
1
court directed that the order granting plaintiff’s motion for an extension be served on plaintiff at
2
his Snake River address of record, and at the Bella Vista address.
3
4
5
The thirty day extension period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an
amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
For the reasons given in the August 24, 2001 and November 18, 2011 orders, IT
6
IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed with prejudice. See Local Rule
7
110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
8
9
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within
10
fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
11
written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate
12
Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and
13
served within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
14
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
15
DATED: February 8, 2012
16
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
ggh:rb
jayne1465.fta.ggh
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?