Parham v. Steemers et al
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/21/12 and United States Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney;ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney, United States Magistrate Judge. All future documents filed in the above captionedcase shall reference the following case number: No. Civ. S-11-1475 CKD. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
LATASHA PARHAM,
11
NO. CIV. S-11-1475 LKK/CKD PS
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
PHILIP STEEMERS, et al.,
O R D E R
14
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has consented
18
to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge.
See 28 U.S.C.
19
ยง 636(c).
20
judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve
21
the reference to the magistrate judge.
According to Local Rule 305, both the district court
22
The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends
23
that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the
24
magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final
25
judgment.
26
////
1
1
2
IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the
undersigned are VACATED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign
4
this case to the Honorable Carolyn K. Delaney, United States
5
Magistrate Judge.
6
captioned case shall reference the following case number: No. Civ.
7
S-11-1475 CKD.
8
DATED:
All future documents filed in the above-
March 21, 2012
9
/s/Lawrence K. Karlton
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON
SENIOR JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
12
13
14
Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case
for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.
DATED:
March 21, 2012
15
16
/s/ Carolyn K. Delaney
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?