Calix, Inc. v. Arris Group, Inc.
Filing
10
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/20/11 ORDERING that dft AGI's deadline to respond to Complaint is EXTENDED to 08/22/11. (Benson, A.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Warren L. Dranit (CA State Bar No. 160252)
Karin P. Beam (CA State Bar No. 112331)
SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
90 South E Street, Suite 200
P.O. Box 1867
Santa Rosa, CA 95402
Telephone:
(707) 524-1900
Facsimile:
(707) 524-1906
Email: dranit@smlaw.com; beam@smlaw.com
Andrew W. Stroud (CA State Bar No. 126475)
Sarah Jane Fischer (CA State Bar No. 260807)
Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud LLP
980 9th Street, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 553-4000
Facsimile: (916) 553-4011
Email: stroud@mgslaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIX, INC.
12
13
U. S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
CALIX, INC. a Delaware corporation,
17
18
19
20
21
Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481-GEB -CMK
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ARRIS TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER
vs.
ARRIS GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation,
and Does 1-18,
Local Rule 144
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
On June 2, 2011, defendant ARRIS Group, Inc. ("AGI") was served with the Complaint in
the above referenced matter.
Initially, AGI's last day to respond to the Complaint was June 23, 2011. However, plaintiff
26
Calix, Inc. and AGI stipulated to a 28 day extension for AGI to respond to the Complaint so that the
27
parties could continue their settlement discussions. Pursuant to Local Rule 144, AGI's last day to
28
respond to the Complaint was extended to July 21, 2011. No other extensions have been granted.
1
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ARRIS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481 GEB-CMK
1
The parties continue to actively engage in settlement discussions. Plaintiff and AGI have
2
stipulated to extend the time for AGI to respond to the Complaint so that settlement discussions may
3
continue and to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of costs and judicial resources. Pursuant to the
4
stipulation, the parties request the Court extend AGI’s last day to respond to the Complaint to and
5
including Monday, August 22, 2011.
6
7
DATED: July 19, 2011
8
9
SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIX, INC.
By:
10
/Warren L. Dranit/
Warren L. Dranit
11
12
13
ORDER
14
15
It is so ordered.
16
17
DATED: July 20, 2011
18
19
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ARRIS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481 GEB-CMK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?