Calix, Inc. v. Arris Group, Inc.

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 07/20/11 ORDERING that dft AGI's deadline to respond to Complaint is EXTENDED to 08/22/11. (Benson, A.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Warren L. Dranit (CA State Bar No. 160252)
Karin P. Beam (CA State Bar No. 112331)
SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
90 South E Street, Suite 200
P.O. Box 1867
Santa Rosa, CA 95402
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Andrew W. Stroud (CA State Bar No. 126475)
Sarah Jane Fischer (CA State Bar No. 260807)
Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud LLP
980 9th Street, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIX, INC.

12
13

U. S. DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

CALIX, INC. a Delaware corporation,

17
18
19
20
21

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481-GEB -CMK

Plaintiff,

STIPULATION FOR SECOND
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR ARRIS TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

vs.
ARRIS GROUP, INC., a Delaware corporation,
and Does 1-18,

Local Rule 144

Defendants.

22
23
24
25

On June 2, 2011, defendant ARRIS Group, Inc. ("AGI") was served with the Complaint in
the above referenced matter.
Initially, AGI's last day to respond to the Complaint was June 23, 2011. However, plaintiff

26

Calix, Inc. and AGI stipulated to a 28 day extension for AGI to respond to the Complaint so that the

27

parties could continue their settlement discussions. Pursuant to Local Rule 144, AGI's last day to

28

respond to the Complaint was extended to July 21, 2011. No other extensions have been granted.
1
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ARRIS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481 GEB-CMK

1

The parties continue to actively engage in settlement discussions. Plaintiff and AGI have

2

stipulated to extend the time for AGI to respond to the Complaint so that settlement discussions may

3

continue and to avoid the unnecessary expenditure of costs and judicial resources. Pursuant to the

4

stipulation, the parties request the Court extend AGI’s last day to respond to the Complaint to and

5

including Monday, August 22, 2011.

6
7

DATED: July 19, 2011

8
9

SPAULDING McCULLOUGH & TANSIL LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIX, INC.

By:

10

/Warren L. Dranit/
Warren L. Dranit

11
12
13

ORDER

14
15

It is so ordered.

16
17

DATED: July 20, 2011

18
19

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
ARRIS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

Case No.: 2:11-cv-01481 GEB-CMK