Jurado v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
STIPULATION and ORDER 24 signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/7/1/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of $4,400.00. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
3
ANN M. CERNEY, SBN: 068748
Attorney at Law
45 Hunter Square Plaza
Stockton, California 95202
Telephone: (209) 948-9384
Facsimile: (209) 948-0706
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
—o0o—
10
11
ALBERT JURADO,
12
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-01489-CMK
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
SETTLING ATTORNEY’S FEES
PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS
TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
15
Defendant(s).
16
/
17
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned
19
counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the
20
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND
21
FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($4,400.00). This amount represents
22
compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with
23
this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §[§ 1920,] 2412(d).
24
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government
25
will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s
26
attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, – S.Ct. – , 2010 WL 2346547 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the
27
ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any
28
1
Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access
To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
1
offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the
2
order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are
3
subject to any offset.
4
Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the
5
Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause
6
the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Ann M. Cerney, pursuant to the
7
assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
8
9
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA
attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
10
Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release
11
from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to
12
EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action.
13
14
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security
Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA.
15
16
Respectfully submitted,
17
18
Date: June 5, 2012
19
/s/ Ann M. Cerney
ANN M. CERNEY,
Attorney for Plaintiff
20
21
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT
Acting Regional Chief Counsel,
Social Security Administration
22
23
24
/s/ David Lerch
25
Date: June 5, 2012
26
27
DAVID LERCH
(by email authorization on 6/5/12)
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
28
2
Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access
To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
1
2
ORDER
APPROVED AND SO ORDERED:
3
4
5
6
DATED: June 7, 2012
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Stipulation and Proposed Order Settling Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access
To Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?