Escalante v. Uhren, et al

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/13/2011 VACATING Defendant's 16 Motion to Dismiss; motion may be re-noticed if Plaintiff files a second amended complaint. (Waggoner, D)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

MIKE ANGEL ESCALANTE,

11

Plaintiff,

No. CIV S-11-1508 JAM GGH P

vs.
12
13

E. UHREN, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He seeks relief pursuant to 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 3, 2011, and defendants filed an

18

answer and a motion to dismiss on August 17, 2011. However, the amended complaint did

19

contain cognizable claims and the court issued a screening order dismissing the complaint with

20

leave to amend. Therefore, the motion to dismiss is vacated, but may be re-noticed if plaintiff

21

files a second amended complaint.

22

////

23

////

24

////

25

////

26

////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ August 17, 2011,

2

motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is vacated but may be re-noticed if plaintiff files a second amended

3

complaint.

4

DATED: September 13, 2011

5

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

6
GGH: AB

7

esca1508.ord2

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2