James v. Fagan
Filing
49
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/25/13 ordering in accordance with the parties stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk of the court shall close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
JOANNA B. HOOD, State Bar No. 264078
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 324-4785
Facsimile: (916) 324-5205
E-mail: Joanna.Hood@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Defendant J. Faggan
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
Case No. 2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P
CHARLES JAMES,
STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY
Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
(Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))
14
v.
15
16
J. FAGGAN,
17
Defendant.
18
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P)
1
Plaintiff Charles James and Defendant J. Faggan have resolved this case in its entirety.
2
Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of
3
Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).
4
Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees.
5
It is so stipulated.
6
7
Dated:
11/21/13
/s/ Charles James
Charles Cornelius James
Plaintiff Pro Se
Dated:
11/21/2013
/s/ Joanna Hood
Joanna B. Hood
Deputy Attorney General
California Attorney General's Office
Attorney for Defendant J. Faggan
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The
Clerk of the Court shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 25, 2013
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
SA2012305459
31837209.doc
27
28
2
Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?