James v. Fagan

Filing 49

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/25/13 ordering in accordance with the parties stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk of the court shall close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California MISHA D. IGRA, State Bar No. 208711 Supervising Deputy Attorney General JOANNA B. HOOD, State Bar No. 264078 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-4785 Facsimile: (916) 324-5205 E-mail: Joanna.Hood@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendant J. Faggan 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 Case No. 2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P CHARLES JAMES, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 14 v. 15 16 J. FAGGAN, 17 Defendant. 18 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P) 1 Plaintiff Charles James and Defendant J. Faggan have resolved this case in its entirety. 2 Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of 3 Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). 4 Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. 5 It is so stipulated. 6 7 Dated: 11/21/13 /s/ Charles James Charles Cornelius James Plaintiff Pro Se Dated: 11/21/2013 /s/ Joanna Hood Joanna B. Hood Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General's Office Attorney for Defendant J. Faggan 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 25, 2013 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 SA2012305459 31837209.doc 27 28 2 Stip. Voluntary Dismissal [Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)] (2:11-cv-1527 GEB EFB P)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?