Callejo v. Martel

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/10/2013 APPOINTING the Federal Defender to represent petitioner; the Clerk shall serve a copy of the petition and this order on David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender; a status conference is SET for 10/9/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; all parties shall appear at the status conference by counsel. (cc: David M. Porter) (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNESTO CALLEJO, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-1550-JKS-EFB P v. ORDER WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas 19 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 27, 2013, United States District Judge James K. 20 Singleton issued a memorandum decision on petitioner’s habeas petition, in which he granted the 21 petition in part, directed the undersigned to hold an evidentiary hearing on petitioner’s claim that 22 his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance in failing to appeal petitioner’s conviction and 23 sentence, and ordered that counsel be appointed for petitioner for the purpose of the evidentiary 24 hearing. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Federal Defender is appointed to represent petitioner. 27 ///// 28 1 1 2 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of the petition and this order on David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender. 3 3. A status conference is set for October 9, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 8. 4 4. All parties shall appear at the status conference by counsel. 5 5. At the status conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss possible dates for the 6 scheduling of the evidentiary hearing and the potential length of the hearing. 7 DATED: September 10, 2013. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?