Blount v. Board of Prison Hearings et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/6/11 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

REGINALD BLOUNT,
Petitioner,

11
12
13

No. CIV S-11-1580 MCE EFB P

vs.
BOARD OF PRISON HEARINGS,
et al.,

14
Respondents.

ORDER

15
/
16
17

Petitioner seeks a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 28, 2011,

18

respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the ground that the petition fails to state a cognizable

19

claim and that there no longer exists a live controversy. Petitioner has not filed an opposition or

20

a statement of no opposition to respondent’s motion to dismiss.

21

A responding party’s failure “to file written opposition or to file a statement of no

22

opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may

23

result in the imposition of sanctions.” L. R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the

24

Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or

25

Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” L. R. 110. The court may dismiss this action

26

with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See
1

1

Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1263 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in

2

dismissing pro se plaintiff’s complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended

3

complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439,

4

1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff’s failure to comply with local rule

5

regarding notice of change of address affirmed).

6

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 21 days of the date of this order,

7

petitioner shall file either an opposition to the motion to dismiss or a statement of no opposition.

8

Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

9

without prejudice.

10

Dated: December 6, 2011.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2