Phillips v Quantum Healthcare

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 1/16/2014 DISMISSING all claims in this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 CATHERINE J. SWANN Assistant United States Attorney 3 501 I Street, 10th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 4 Telephone: (916) 554-2762 Fax: (916) 554-2900 5 6 Attorneys for the United States of America 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , and the STATES OF ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, LOUISIANA, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MONTANA, NEVADA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, OKLAHOMA, RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, VIRGINIA, and WISCONSIN ex rel. CHARLES PHILLIPS, M.D., 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case No. 2:11-CV-1588 MCE KJN ORDER ON VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Plaintiffs, v. QUANTUM HEALTHCARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.; TEAM PHYSICIANS OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; TEAM HEALTH, INC.; TEAM HEALTH HOLDINGS, LLC; T-SYSTEM, INC.; MARINA MEDICAL BILLING SERVICE, INC.; VALLEY EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.; AND SIERRA RURAL PHYSICIANS, INC., Defendants. Relator having filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice of this action 26 pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the United having consented thereto pursuant to 27 28 29 1 1 1 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1) and twenty-three of the twenty-four named states joining in this consent, 2 and for good cause shown, the Court hereby rules as follows: 3 All claims in this action be and hereby are dismissed without prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: January 16, 2014 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 1 As listed in the States’ Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, filed on August 16, 2014, at ECF No. 27. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?