California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Stockton Recycling, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/9/12 ORDERING that defendant Fred Espino is DISMISSED without prejudice from civil case nos. 2:11-CV-0705 LKK CKD and 2:11-cv-1239-LKK CKD, and defendant Paul Faias is DISMISSED without prejudice from civil case no. 2:-11-cv-0705 LKK CKD. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Thomas M. Bruen (SBN 63324)
Erik A. Reinertson (SBN 218031)
LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN
A Professional Corporation
1990 N. California Boulevard, Suite 620
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants STOCKTON
RECYCLING, INC. and JAMES WILLIAMS

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,

12
Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS FRED ESPINO AND PAUL
FAIAS; ORDER

vs.

Before: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual,
and FRED ESPINO, an individual, and PAUL
FAIAS, an individual,

(Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
33 U.S.C. § 1251 et seq.)

Defendants.

17
18

CIV. NO. S-11-705-LKK/CKD

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,

CIV. NO. S-11-1239-LKK/CKD

19
Plaintiff,

20
vs.

21
22

STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual,
and FRED ESPINO, an individual,

23

Defendants.

24
25
26

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION
ALLIANCE, a non-profit corporation,
Plaintiff,

27
28

CIV. NO. S-11-1599-LKK/CKD

vs.

1
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

1
2

STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California
corporation, and JAMES WILLIAMS, an
individual,

3

Defendants.

4
5
6
7
8
9

Pursuant to federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), Plaintiff California Sportfishing
Protection Alliance and Defendants Stockton Recycling, Inc. and James Williams, constituting all
of the parties who have appeared in this action, stipulate as follows:
1.

To the dismissal of Defendants Fred Espino (“Espino”) and Paul Faias (“Faias”)

from Civil Case No. S-11-705-LKK/CKD without prejudice;
To the dismissal of Defendant Espino from Civil Case No. S-11-1239-LKK/CKD

10

2.

11

without prejudice;

12

3.

13

That Espino and Faias each bear their own costs and fees.

Respectfully submitted,

14
15

Dated: December 15, 2011

16

/s/ Erik M. Roper
(As authorized on Dec. 14, 2011 – L.R. 131)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE

17
18
19
20

LAW OFFICES OF ANDREW L. PACKARD

Date: December 15, 2011

21
22

LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS M. BRUEN
A Professional Corporation
/s/ Thomas Bruen

23

Attorneys for Defendants
STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC.
and JAMES WILLIAMS

24
25
26
27
28

2
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to Stipulation, and good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that Defendant Fred

3

Espino is dismissed without prejudice from Civil Case Nos. S-11-705-LKK/CKD and S-11-1239-

4

LKK/CKD and that Defendant Paul Faias is dismissed without prejudice from Civil Case No. S-11-

5

705-LKK/CKD.

6
7

Dated: January 9, 2012.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
________________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL