California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Stockton Recycling, Inc. et al

Filing 7

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/21/11 ORDERING that the action denominated CIV. NO. S-11-1239 GEB/GGH, and the same hereby is, reassigned to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all f urther proceedings. The caption on documents filed in this reassigned case shall be shown as CIV. NO. S-11-1239 LKK/EFB. Case CIV. NO. S-11-1599 LKK/EFB is already assigned to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Any dat es currently set in these three cases are hereby VACATED. A status conference is set for September 26, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. in all three cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Matson, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a nonprofit corporation, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 17 STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual, FRED ESPINO, an individual, and PAUL FAIAS, an individual, 18 Defendants. 16 CIV. NO. S-11-705 LKK/EFB / 19 20 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a nonprofit corporation, 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. CIV. NO. S-11-1239 GEB/GGH 23 25 STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California corporation, JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual, and FRED ESPINO, an individual, 26 Defendants. 24 / 1 2 CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, a nonprofit corporation, 3 Plaintiff, 4 5 6 v. CIV. NO. S-11-1599 LKK/EFB STOCKTON RECYCLING, INC., a California corporation, and JAMES WILLIAMS, an individual, 7 RELATED CASE ORDER Defendants. / 8 9 Examination of the above-entitled actions reveals that 10 the cases are related within the meaning of Local Rule 123(a) (E.D. 11 Cal. 2011). 12 same questions of law. The actions involve similar questions of fact and the 13 Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge 14 and magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of 15 judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the 16 parties. 17 The parties should be aware that relating the cases under 18 Local Rule 123 merely has the result that the actions are assigned 19 to the same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation of the 20 actions is effected. 21 related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate 22 judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. Under the regular practice of this court, 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated CIV. NO. 24 S-11-1239 GEB/GGH, and the same hereby is, reassigned to Judge 25 Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all 26 further proceedings. 2 1 Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in this 2 reassigned case shall be shown as CIV. NO. S-11-1239 LKK/EFB. Case 3 CIV. NO. S-11-1599 LKK/EFB is already assigned to Judge Lawrence 4 K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. 5 Any dates currently set in these three cases are hereby 6 VACATED. A status conference is set for September 26, 2011 at 1:30 7 p.m. in all three cases. 8 9 10 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment compensate for this reassignment. DATED: July 21, 2011. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 of civil cases to

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?